It has nothing to do with imprecision. Nor does it have anything to do with objectivity. I'm more talking about the neutrality and "centrality" of the choices

It has nothing to do with imprecision. Nor does it have anything to do with objectivity. I'm more talking about the neutrality and "centrality" of the choices of study. Something like ethics and religion are more a biased choice that say something like logic from my perspective. What if we encountered an alien race or intelligent beings with no form of religion or ethics? Dolphins or chimpanzees perhaps? It's certainly possible but I would argue it's hard to imagine finding an intelligent race of beings not governed by the rules of logic. That's why I consider logic an unbiased choice and religion and ethics a biased and arbitrary choice. Our bias tends towards the the human experience as opposed to a truly more neutral perspective.