>Correct me if I’m reading you wrongly, but It seems to me when you say high level you’re offering philosophy up as an umbrella where all things that fall benea

>Correct me if I’m reading you wrongly, but It seems to me when you say high level you’re offering philosophy up as an umbrella where all things that fall beneath it are then equivocated. No we mean the same thing. Though I do not agree with you that philosophy is more fundamental then science or logic. >You’ll also note that there are many similarities in its logic and methods of categorization. Any random topic can be founded on arbitrary axioms to create theorems of unlimited complexity. This does not justify study imo.