The part about being pressured to post the statement about BLM may be true. Nothing wrong with pointing that out. But then she starts to over-speculate about A

The part about being pressured to post the statement about BLM may be true. Nothing wrong with pointing that out. But then she starts to over-speculate about Armstrong's emotions without any basis and tries to frame him as an unstable person. All of this simply because Armstrong posted about his company's mission. How would she feel if talking about her company's mission resulted in execs from other companies tweeting about her "having a meltdown", simply because she has a different political perspective?