3 ms·

Are you sure? I have never heard that repo branches were originally called slaves.

• DonaldPShimoda 6y ago
  Git was meant to replace BitKeeper, which explicitly used master/slave terminology: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-May/msg00066.html https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2019-May/...
  • throwaway123999 6y ago
    Wrong, it was indeed from "master recording": https://twitter.com/xpasky/status/1272280760280637441 https://twitter.com/xpasky/status/1272280760280637441 That tweet is from the original creator who made "master" the default branch in git.
  • throwaway123999 6y ago
    The original creator who made "master" the default branch in git claims it was from "master recording", not "master/slave". https://twitter.com/xpasky/status/1272280760280637441 https://twitter.com/xpasky/status/1272280760280637441
• jdjdjsjjs 6y ago
  The original creator who made "master" the default branch in git claims it was from "master recording", not "master/slave": https://twitter.com/xpasky/status/127228076028 https://twitter.com/xpasky/status/127228076028