4 ms·
It's not about erasing history. It's about the ongoing impact of blatantly referencing the notion of enslaving people.
by intortus 6y ago
It's not about erasing history. It's about the ongoing impact of blatantly referencing the notion of enslaving people.
- smegcicle 6y agoThe parent is pointing out is that what was once an oblique reference to human slavery is now being changed in explicit reference to human slavery
- mcphage 6y ago> is now being changed in explicit reference to human slavery So? It's being changed to something that's no longer an oblique reference to human slavery. The fact that it's being done to because of that reference to human slavery is the entire point, not a mark against it.
- ithkuil 6y agoIs it really ao blatant though? Is the word master ever been used to refer to a slave owner?
- ithkuil 6y agoEDIT: ever been used to refer to anything other than a slave owner?
- ominous 6y agoYes. As a first example, I give you the default name for a git repository up to October 2020, on github. It wasn't used to mean "a slave owner". And a second random example here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastering_(audio) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastering_(audio)