5 ms·
If it were true that people doing job= no exploitation, then we wouldn’t need labor laws. Paying people below poverty wages, and people doing the job because th
by 542354234235 6y ago
If it were true that people doing job= no exploitation, then we wouldn’t need labor laws. Paying people below poverty wages, and people doing the job because they need the money is exploitation. It is taking advantage of the asymmetry of the power in a relationship between a rich company and a poor employee to set terms that that are exploitative of the employee.
- 908B64B197 6y agoBut in this case, it's claimed that any fast food joint job pays better than Uber. I don't see how the platform could keep a steady number of drivers if that was true. And, to he honest, I really don't like the condescending attitude some politicians have toward Uber drivers. They seem to assume they can't do the math to figure out if they are profitable or not.