This article is best read in reverse. The last line says: > I expect deep fake programs to become good enough to fool FakeCatcher in a few months. Yes. If you

This article is best read in reverse. The last line says: > I expect deep fake programs to become good enough to fool FakeCatcher in a few months. Yes. If you can test for it, they can too. Anyone who claims otherwise is selling bridges. > Deep fakes can’t convincingly mimic how your pulse shows up in your face. "Don't", not "can't". This is the problem with all detection claims. Obviously they will in the future. Probably soon, as the final sentence says.