4 ms·
The guy could be a contractor for both, and some details may have been lost in the telephone game. Also, the only thing that's a problem is the employment cont
by lallysingh 6y ago
The guy could be a contractor for both, and some details may have been lost in the telephone game.
Also, the only thing that's a problem is the employment contract. They both surely have clauses about working for someone else in the industry, and/or listing any side businesses.
- justinclift 6y agoWonder which one will have "exclusive ownership" of any created IP? If the roles are very different, it could be clear cut. If the roles have substantial overlap though...
- C1sc0cat 6y agoThe contract would normally disallow working for competitors I know when the agency I worked for worked with Disney we signed an exclusivity agreement that we could not work with paramount MGM universal etc.
- jojo2333 6y agoNot true. Contractors, by law, have the ability to work when/how they want including for multiple clients. If there is something specific in the contract, it is a civil issue.