4 ms·
Mostly, because we know that there were eras when women dominated programming, typing, debugging, documentation, etc. So we know that there's no biological or i
by Kednicma 6y ago
Mostly, because we know that there were eras when women dominated programming, typing, debugging, documentation, etc. So we know that there's no biological or innate reason why women are unable/unwilling/unskilled at this labor. Instead, we conclude that it's culture.
Incidentally, part of the culture which causes women to leave is your inherently-othering comment which seeks to divide women and men into a binary categorization.
Edit to the children comments: To spell it out more clearly: The proportion of laborers in different fields is wholly cultural. The entire concept of fields of labor is wholly cultural. The entire concept of labor as something done not just for survival is cultural. Your brains are extremely plastic and you exist almost entirely on cultural, not instinctual, impulses.
- throw2021_01 6y agoWhy do most men cannot make good money on OnlyFans?
- nickthemagicman 6y agoThose eras where women had very little choice of other careers except clerical positions of which programming was an extension of at the time. Well aren't they? There's quite a lot of differences between men and women whether one wants to accept it or not. There's massive amounts of socioligical and physiological science backing this. Additionally, you can Google sociological studies on what women and men prioritize in their careers and women overwhelming prefer caregiving and time for family while men prefer more traditional status and materialistic success. Google it! Step out of the critical sex theory for a second. This isn't some toxic masculinity seeking to repress women. This is reality.
- thursday0987 6y ago> Mostly, because we know that there were eras when women dominated programming, typing, debugging, documentation, etc. wasn't this the same era that women were mostly secretaries and programming, typing, debugging, doucmentation, etc. were all seen as secondary tasks supporting the main effort instead of the main effort itself? also, during these eras, there simply weren't nearly as many programmers or money in programming, so the segment of the population that even had access to a computer, let alone knew how to program, was severly limited and not a representative sample of the potential population of programmers at that time. > So we know that there's no biological or innate reason why women are unable/unwilling/unskilled at this labor. we know no such thing and its bad science to say that we do. Perhaps you should qualify this statement to be more clear. > Instead, we conclude that it's culture. bad conclusion that ignores other factors, including availability of access to computers, proportion of the population that knows how to program, status of programming in relation to the work being done (secretary work vs primary work), etc.
- throw2021_01 6y agoWhy is it that most men cannot make good money on OnlyFans?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]