4 ms·
They are still trying to determine pricing, and figure out how to position themselves against competitors (who are about to have thier lunch eaten if gh is smar
by beardedwizard 6y ago
They are still trying to determine pricing, and figure out how to position themselves against competitors (who are about to have thier lunch eaten if gh is smart)
- prepend 6y agoI wonder if the problem is that the marginal cost is near zero because the rules are mostly open source and there’s no special infrastructure. So the problem is that they are trying to figure out the “value” instead of giving it out for free. What’s interesting about gitlab’s sast is that it’s really mostly just curating open source tools and using their existing CI stack. So it’s possible to just look at their code and set up, but a hassle. I’m hoping GH just gives it away for free. Or does some sort of sonarqube method where you layer on indemnity or something. The problem is that per user pricing sucks because most users don’t care. The PM or maybe one or two are interested, but paying for 400 users with licenses to please 5 audit people doesn’t make sense when it’s really just being run by a single Jenkins robot (or equivalent).
- beardedwizard 6y agoI'm also concerned about per user pricing