3 ms·
That assumes that more programmers doesn’t mean more programmers. I suspect the inverse, the more programmers we have, the more systems they create to program,
by crispyporkbites 6y ago
That assumes that more programmers doesn’t mean more programmers. I suspect the inverse, the more programmers we have, the more systems they create to program, and the more programmers we need.
- beagle3 6y agoFurther, the notation is a "tip of the iceberg" issue; the iceberg is semantics, and I suspect anyone who can grasp the semantics well enough to actually build something, can handle the notation (even if there's a notation they could handle better). Which possibly means - the more notation-capable-but-semantics-challenged people are working in the field, the more work for the semantics-capapble people to clean after them.
- siltpotato 6y agoBut eventually this reaches an equilibrium, or else we'd all be programmers. There is no law stating that more programmers always means more programmers.