> In order to properly compare the languages, we needed to collect the energy consumed by a single execution of a specific solution. With this, Java ranking on

> In order to properly compare the languages, we needed to collect the energy consumed by a single execution of a specific solution. With this, Java ranking on top 5 is quite impressive. Considering that JIT optimisations wouldn't have really kicked in. My hypothesis is that if the Java program was allowed to run a few more times, and then compared, it would rank higher. And, along the lines, couldn't the other compiled languages and vm-based (common lisp, racket) be JIT optimised?