3 ms·
That's a press release, not a technical paper, so yeah, it's fairly lacking on technical details. Performance of quantum computers is rather difficult to summa
by boothby 6y ago
That's a press release, not a technical paper, so yeah, it's fairly lacking on technical details. Performance of quantum computers is rather difficult to summarize in an easily digestible measure, so press releases tend to cover the basics: a number of qubits, a degree of connectivity, etc. You might prefer a whitepaper[1] that does dig into some of the more technical performance details. (alas, it took me a couple of tries to find the paper as our webserver seems to be stumbling under load)
Our focus isn't on artificial benchmarks. Our approach is more pragmatic. We build the best hardware that we can today, and the best software stack around that we can, and we're building our business around getting better solutions into the hands of customers.
[1] https://www.dwavesys.com/sites/default/files/14-1049A-A_The_D-Wave_Advantage_System_An_Overview_0.pdf https://www.dwavesys.com/sites/default/files/14-1049A-A_The_...
- heyitsguay 6y agoDo you have any case studies with partners?
- boothby 6y agoThere's a few out there; here's a couple that I'm familiar with. https://www.dwavesys.com/sites/default/files/Dwave_Menten%20AI_Case_Study_V7_1_0.pdf https://www.dwavesys.com/sites/default/files/Dwave_Menten%20... https://www.dwavesys.com/sites/default/files/Dwave_Groovenauts_Case_Study_V2.pdf https://www.dwavesys.com/sites/default/files/Dwave_Groovenau... There's quite a few technical reports by partners out there, as well. https://www.dwavesys.com/resources/publications?type=external https://www.dwavesys.com/resources/publications?type=externa...
- davidgerard 6y ago> Our focus isn't on artificial benchmarks. Our approach is more pragmatic. We build the best hardware that we can today, and the best software stack around that we can, and we're building our business around getting better solutions into the hands of customers. Speaking as a sysadmin, this reads like "our numbers are so hilariously bad, that we're trying to deprecate the concept of measurement." So, tell me. Precisely what are your results on the "artificial benchmarks"? Something that someone with one of your boxes could verify.