> There is no fraudulence there. Sorry, I was insufficiently explicit. "Indians who have lived in America for ten years" are past immigrants. They have already

> There is no fraudulence there. Sorry, I was insufficiently explicit. "Indians who have lived in America for ten years" are past immigrants. They have already immigrated. A effort to "curtail[] future immigration" that allows deporting them to be part of it is fraudulently misrepresenting that past immigration as part of the "future immigration" which it purports to curtail. The issuance of genuinely new visas (ie to people who have not yet immigrated) is a separate issue from renewing visas of people who have already immigrated, regardless of whether those are, on paper, both lumped into the single catagory of "[']temporary['] visas". > Unfortunately, I cannot discuss this further. Fair enough; good luck on whatever came up.