3 ms·
I've seen people complain that talking about Sweden's approach is pointless because other countries that took the same approach couldn't expect the same results
by makomk 6y ago
I've seen people complain that talking about Sweden's approach is pointless because other countries that took the same approach couldn't expect the same results, but that's actually much more clear for New Zealand. For a start, just the inherent leakage of infections into the country through the quarantine hotel system, imports, etc - which causes a new imported cluster say every hundred days or less at New Zealand scale - means that a larger country would never reach the point where they eliminate Covid. Then there's the problem that other countries are just too well connected compared to an island nation a thousand miles from anywhere - if you tried the same thing in EU countries or the UK, you'd run into the problem that they rely on a constant stream of commercial trucking traffic across the border carrying important things like food, people live in different countries from their workplace, etc, all of which help spread the virus.
- return1 6y agoI dont think people catch the virus through contaminated surfaces. It s almost always airborne transmission
- makomk 6y agoAll those cross-border trucks have drivers, just like the ships importing stuff into New Zealand have crew. Unlike ships, the trucks don't just stop at the border and unload - they go on to destinations within the country, use trucking facilities along the route, etc. It's the people that're the main risk rather than the goods they carry. (Though when trying to eliminate the virus altogether even rare events can be a problem. There's some evidence that Covid may have spread to a NZ quarantine hotel worker via a contaminated surface and nearly escaped into the community. Obviously, the bigger the country the more likely rare events are to occur too.)