4 ms·
> you could easily turn off green cards and deport a quarter million Indians who have lived in America for ten years on temporary visas. That's not future immi
by a1369209993 6y ago
> you could easily turn off green cards and deport a quarter million Indians who have lived in America for ten years on temporary visas.
That's not future immigration, that's past immigration fraudulently misrepresented as future immigration on paper.
- renewiltord 6y agoHey, sorry, I unfortunately cannot delete the comment so just responding to acknowledge. The 'temporary visas' are dual-intent so they are intended to be for immigration as well. There is no fraudulence there. Unfortunately, I cannot discuss this further.
- a1369209993 6y ago> There is no fraudulence there. Sorry, I was insufficiently explicit. "Indians who have lived in America for ten years" are past immigrants. They have already immigrated. A effort to "curtail[] future immigration" that allows deporting them to be part of it is fraudulently misrepresenting that past immigration as part of the "future immigration" which it purports to curtail. The issuance of genuinely new visas (ie to people who have not yet immigrated) is a separate issue from renewing visas of people who have already immigrated, regardless of whether those are, on paper, both lumped into the single catagory of "[']temporary['] visas". > Unfortunately, I cannot discuss this further. Fair enough; good luck on whatever came up.