3 ms·
The article talks about 'good things' but doesn't put them in context of valuation. $60B is still too much. It's odd that Buffet is in, it's a weird signal, b
by jariel 6y ago
The article talks about 'good things' but doesn't put them in context of valuation.
$60B is still too much.
It's odd that Buffet is in, it's a weird signal, because this is a weird era for markets: all other things equal, we are looking at .com-ish situations here and the timing would be ideal for a true crash.
That the world economy is shrinking by 10% and governments, major industries are going insolvent should be scary.
Perhaps investors think they are preparing for the 'covid future' but this may be a weird kind of inflation whereby everything else (including cash) is crap so they are piling into winners.
There is an emotion to a lot of stocks these days that is probably making every analysts job a nightmare - if the CEO or company is popular, it really messes with valuation.
- panda88888 6y agoOne thing to keep in mind is the price at which Buffet invested. I vaguely remember they he invested at about $70 per share (I may be wrong. Just going by memory here). This means there are a lot of buffer room for correction at current price of around $250.
- phonon 6y ago> It's odd that Buffet is in More like Todd Combs and Ted Weschler...
- sjg007 6y agoI am guessing all of the Berkshire companies are either integrating into snowflake or have.