5 ms·
Cicero, like many other philosophers of antiquity, places ultimate value on the goal of 'a life well-lived'. In this essay, he basically says 'old age is fine,
by stakkur 6y ago
Cicero, like many other philosophers of antiquity, places ultimate value on the goal of 'a life well-lived'. In this essay, he basically says 'old age is fine, if you lived a good life beforehand', and hedges by saying death's no big deal.
Which is, of course, rubbish. That's not really how life works: rewards rarely follow your efforts to live a good life. There are often no rewards at all; a life of diligent savings can disappear in an instant, physical fitness can end with cancer, faithfulness can end in bitter disappointment. Attempting to 'optimize' your life, your finances, your career often put you in places you never wanted to be.
The Buddhists come closer to what life is really about: life is not a journey, it's a dance. And you can dance anytime; old age can be joyous anytime you choose to dance--you don't need a 'good life' preceding it to make it good. Or, TL;DR: All you ever have in life is this one moment, right now.
- dint 6y agoCan you recommend readings about the Buddhist take on this?
- gratalis 6y agoMediums and messengers resonate differently for different folks at different times but I find these resources helpful: https://www.audiodharma.org/teacher/1/ https://www.audiodharma.org/teacher/1/ https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=gil+fronsdal https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=gil+fronsdal https://fiveinvitations.com/about-frank-ostaseski/ https://fiveinvitations.com/about-frank-ostaseski/ https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=frank+ostaseski https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=frank+ostaseski
- l332mn 6y agoBuddhism is closer to Stoicism than you think. There's plenty of suttas where the Buddha explains how virtuous behavior leads to good outcomes to you even in this life (like high regard among your peers), and even material rewards (like wealth). All good outcomes ultimately boil down to virtuous behavior. This is the workings of Karma, one of the most central concepts in Buddhism. In Buddhism, rewards follow virtuous behavior by necessity, and if not in this life, then in the next. It's really odd of you saying that for Buddhism, life a "dance". This is really not what Buddhism is about. Sounds more like Nietzsche to me (an anti-buddhist). Buddhism is about virtue, the four noble truths and following the noble eight-fold path. 'old age is fine, if you lived a good life beforehand' - this truly rings true in Buddhism, as your actions in this life determines your place of rebirth in the next.
- stakkur 6y ago>>It's really odd of you saying that for Buddhism, life a "dance". This is really not what Buddhism is about. Alan Watts--who had a thing or two to say about Buddhism--disagrees with you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERbvKrH-GC4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERbvKrH-GC4
- l332mn 6y agoThat video doesn't support your statement at all. Besides, I don't think Alan Watts is an authoritative source on Buddhism regardless.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]