2 ms·
Speaking as a federal government enterprise contractor and former large corporate contractor, that is a pretty common story. So is this: "The problem is that C
by mcguire 6y ago
Speaking as a federal government enterprise contractor and former large corporate contractor, that is a pretty common story. So is this:
"The problem is that Clever, which is now in like 60% of the nation's schools, then is able to extort a very high fee from any educational software vendor that wishes to continue serving the district. Just to give you an example, we recently signed a contract with XYZ Public Schools for the 2020-2021 school year for $18,000. XXYZ now wants us to use Clever for rostering and sign on — Clever has a minimum price to do this of $10,800. If we don't pay this fee to Clever (thus losing our ability to properly serve XYZ’s teachers and students), our chances of continuing our relationship in the future is in serious jeopardy…"
- jeffbee 6y agoI just don't understand how they sell it to school districts. If you already adopted ChromeOS you have a robust, free SSO solution that's freely available and already integrated into virtually all relevant applications. What problem does Clever claim to be solving for you?
- mcguire 6y agoThe article says, "also passes to apps necessary information about who is in what class (rostering)." Presumably, that includes authorization based on rosters. It's also free to districts.