4 ms·
The cool thing is that while Coinbase gets to use its inherent power/leverage over workers to get a certain outcome (capital is a form of power btw) workers can
by andymoe 6y ago
The cool thing is that while Coinbase gets to use its inherent power/leverage over workers to get a certain outcome (capital is a form of power btw) workers can use their inherent power (withholding labor, negotiating as a unit, building consensus etc) to get their desired outcome and behavior from the company.
No one owes anyone anything and there are not really any rules here. Consequences and outcomes yes but no real rules.
So the people that work at Coinbase took some action (walkout) and the CEO is taking some action (blog post/policy/vision clarification/severance offers to leave). His job is to convince and use his power to get his desired outcome. But employees have a similar amount of power to change the vision and direction of the company too. They don’t often wield it well since it’s been in business owners best interest to convince workers they don’t have this power at all.
It will be interesting to see if the employees realize any of this and how they respond.
- baryphonic 6y agoThey are free to leave. No one is essential at any job, no matter how much mom and dad and the college admissions department told her she that she was.
- meesles 6y agoYou're missing the point. By choosing not to leave the employees can wield influence over the company. The employees also don't need Coinbase; there are other companies paying the same and working on the same problems.
- andymoe 6y agoI think perhaps Marco’s thread on this more clearly articulates what I was trying to get at. Maybe y’all disagree but it does not really matter... it only matters how the power is wielded and who benefits and how. https://twitter.com/polotek/status/1311431871474003968?s=21 https://twitter.com/polotek/status/1311431871474003968?s=21