> Why is a company wanting to be apolitical is controversial? It's wild. That was standard not long ago. Most companies, even in tech, were apolitical. Maybe t

> Why is a company wanting to be apolitical is controversial? It's wild. That was standard not long ago. Most companies, even in tech, were apolitical. Maybe there would be some watercooler chat near the election with that one coworker who was really into politics, but that was about it. People mostly didn't know or care what the politics of their coworkers were. If they did, it wasn't a big deal and would still be friendly regardless. But now many are convinced they are warriors in a never-ending existential war. Then it's hard to understand why someone isn't a warrior. "We're about to die! What are you doing, not fighting? You must choose a side. You're with us or against us!" Normally this happened on a 4 year cadence[1]. Locusts would descend to rally the troops, warn of impending doom, have the battle (vote), and then go hibernate for a few years. But now it's non-stop. The war just never ends. It bleeds into everything. Those who choose to not participate in the war or don't engage in the approved way are looked at with suspicion, accused of being the enemy. 1. https://benlandautaylor.com/2018/09/22/the-four-year-locusts/ https://benlandautaylor.com/2018/09/22/the-four-year-locusts...