3 ms·
I understand the points of praise, but let me offer a counter argument. Companies have an obligation to defend the system that provided the environment in which
by cmsonger 6y ago
I understand the points of praise, but let me offer a counter argument. Companies have an obligation to defend the system that provided the environment in which they were formed and flourished.
This election is a bit different than normal. I've never seen a sitting president that would not commit to the peaceful transfer of power. You really think that coinbase would be where it is if we had that for the last 50 year? You think silicon valley would be silicon valley?
I don't.
- xvector 6y ago> Companies have an obligation to defend the system that provided the environment in which they were formed and flourished. No, the only thing companies are obligated to do is what they want to do (usually profit), within the boundaries of the law. There’s no obligation to support the environment in which you flourished. A particularly ruthless company might actively work against that environment to prevent competitors. And it’d be fine - use the law to define what a company can or cannot do instead of depending on personal (company) responsibility.