8 ms·
Some one from Apple, I'm sure you read this. Please answer this ASAP. I rely on mac and FileValute for professional use at work. Need to know the state of this
by deepstack 6y ago
Some one from Apple, I'm sure you read this. Please answer this ASAP. I rely on mac and FileValute for professional use at work. Need to know the state of this exploit.
- m1gu3l 6y agolol good luck and god bless with all that.
- pstadler 6y agoBow for the chosen one!
- devenblake 6y ago> I rely on Mac and FileVault for professional use ... then phase out your use, because proprietary systems will always get cracked given enough time.
- acdha 6y agoGood point, let’s switch to unbreakable open source systems based on OpenSSL instead. This kind of advocacy is not only unhelpful but actually counterproductive
- tedunangst 6y agoSoftware encryption is very often much easier to rotate than integrated solutions. When all the TPM chips were broken, Windows stopped using them for BitLocker, but didn't reencrypt any of the affected disks. They're just as vulnerable as they were.
- acdha 6y agoSoftware encryption is also harder to protect without a trusted boot path. My point was just that this isn't a simple binary decision but rather something which requires review and defense in depth.
- parliament32 6y ago>FileVault for professional use Probably not the best choice :) you never want to use proprietary software if security is a concern
- duhi88 6y agoWhat is a non-proprietary solution for full-disk encryption?
- williamscales 6y agoluks
- centimeter 6y agoluks or zfs.
- aborsy 6y agoOr Veracrypt.
- blacklion 6y agoI want not note, that ZFS is not full disk encryption. ZFS native encryption was designed to allow secure backups via "zfs send | zfs receive" mechanism, so it encrypt only data blocks, and not metadata. LUKS and GEIL are full-disk encryption systems, and if you need FDE, you must use them under ZFS, not ZFS native encryption.