3 ms·
I agree with the basic premise: productive people do not have time to engage in petty fights. On the other hand, there are many situations where there is a sil
by anwalters 6y ago
I agree with the basic premise: productive people do not have time to engage in petty fights.
On the other hand, there are many situations where there is a silent majority of productive people who would literally need to speak up only once to topple an unfair system.
The unfair system can be an open source project that has been hijacked by a small group of ideologists, it can be bad working conditions in ware houses.
Certainly in the case of the open source project it would require just on mail per silent majority member to express dissent and shut down the bureaucrats.
Yet, even in the simplest case it does not happen. So there seem to be more powerful forces at play than just lack of time: Lethargy, craving irrational authority, prisoner's dilemma (who speaks up first).
- ZephyrBlu 6y agoI have a theory that for worse or for better, the silent majority of productive people are more inclined to work with what they've got than attempt to change the system because attempting to change the system is generally unproductive.
- vendiddy 6y agoI feel this way. I would like to change the system, but if I get pulled into every cause I'll never get anything done. It doesn't mean I won't speak up about anything, but I am picking my battles.
- hackerfromthefu 6y agoSome are also wary of unintended consequences .. complex systems almost never respond to changes as you imagine they would.