3 ms·
No, what he said is that no issue is big enough to distract him and Coinbase from making as much money as possible (setting aside how truthful he was). It's al
by samastur 6y ago
No, what he said is that no issue is big enough to distract him and Coinbase from making as much money as possible (setting aside how truthful he was).
It's also not a question of us against them. What we decide to do or not do all has a meaning, even just standing on the side. It is certainly possible to agree with viewpoints without acting on them, but it's not possible to support them.
- ZephyrBlu 6y ago> No, what he said is that no issue is big enough to distract him and Coinbase from making as much money as possible (setting aside how truthful he was) Even if we take his words cynically, is this the wrong thing to do if that is the path he's chosen? Context switching is very hard for an individual let alone an organization, and no one will ever agree what the most important issue(s) is/are (Racism, poverty, climate change, etc). The way I see it is that it's about picking your battles. It's impossible to support and act on every good cause out there. I don't understand what you expect people to do.
- samastur 6y agoI think it is the wrong thing to choose, but he is obviously free to take it as we all are. I don't expect him to do anything though and I don't think my take was cynical either. If problems we are facing in 2020 are not big enough to distract him from his focus, then it is difficult to imagine what would. I agree that you can't support every good cause you agree with, but choices we make do say something about our priorities. What none of us has a right to is that others will not judge us for them.