Here in Norway I think that the kind of surveillance described would be of debatable legality. And would be regarded by pretty much everyone as a breach of tru

Here in Norway I think that the kind of surveillance described would be of debatable legality. And would be regarded by pretty much everyone as a breach of trust and etiquette. In particular such arrangements must be discussed between the employer and the representatives of the employees and the employer must choose the least invasive alternative. Here is a document giving guidance on the subject, sorry it's only available in Norwegian: https://www.arbeidstilsynet.no/contentassets/04ec2eb566d44942bd6693e9e3a0c99e/veileder-om-kontroll-og-overvaking-2019.pdf https://www.arbeidstilsynet.no/contentassets/04ec2eb566d4494... Also this one on camera surveillance which is analogous to screenshots: https://www.datatilsynet.no/personvern-pa-ulike-omrader/overvaking-og-sporing/kameraovervaking/kameraovervaking-arbedsliv/ https://www.datatilsynet.no/personvern-pa-ulike-omrader/over... "For at en arbeidsgiver skal kunne kameraovervåke en arbeidsplass, krever loven at det må foreligge et særskilt behov dersom man skal overvåke områder der bare de ansatte ferdes." in English (my translation): "In order for an employer to use video surveillance of a workplace, the law requires that there be a specific need if one is to monitor areas where only the employees go." I imagine that the Datatilsyn (Data Protection Authority) would regard regular screenshotting as similar.