I've a similar collection of "functions", but I implemented them just as plain bash/sh scripts in my ~/bin. I think putting your functions into regular executab

I've a similar collection of "functions", but I implemented them just as plain bash/sh scripts in my ~/bin. I think putting your functions into regular executables on the path would have been more portable. That way you wouldn't need to call them from a fish shell to run them (you can still use fish scripting language if you like).