2 ms·
> alcohol only seemed good for you because we mis-categorized sick quitters as tee-totalers Is this actually true, or just speculation?
by rrrrrrrrrrrryan 6y ago
> alcohol only seemed good for you because we mis-categorized sick quitters as tee-totalers
Is this actually true, or just speculation?
- dundarious 6y agoIt does appear to be true -- no amount of alcohol is "good for you", based on meta-analyses like https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17478320/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17478320/. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25670722/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25670722/ provides something of an overview. Mendelian randomization is quite interesting too. On another note, there's this thing called sci dash hub dot se, which I've never used, but I'm hearing about it more and more.