6 ms·
Timeline (in case you want to skip over some parts): 00:01:00 - introducing Dennis Whyte, MIT department head for nuclear science 00:04:24 - presentation star
by maccam94 6y ago
Timeline (in case you want to skip over some parts):
00:01:00 - introducing Dennis Whyte, MIT department head for nuclear science
00:04:24 - presentation starts
00:06:00 - identifies breakthrough with REBCO magnets
00:07:25 - explains deuterium-tritium fusion
00:12:30 - basic metrics for reactor performance
00:17:15 - energy output of other previous fusion experiments
00:19:00 - examines ITER and the problems of its approach
00:22:00 - problems solved by high energy magnetic fields
00:28:15 - full scale reactor concept, teardown of REBCO magnets
00:37:00 - design limits and margins
00:39:00 - fixes plasma instabilities found in weaker magnetic chambers
00:40:00 - maintainability, lifespan, component replacement
00:45:00 - solution to neutron damage and energy capture
00:50:30 - cost and profitability
00:54:00 - full graph of field strength vs reactor scale (and thus funding requirements)
01:01:50 - Q&A
01:30:00 - question about the biggest risks
Also a more recent video, with more numbers and even more confidence than the first: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY6U4wB-oYM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rY6U4wB-oYM
- Robotbeat 6y agoI think they're using Yttrium (i.e. YBCO), right? It's hard to find that info.
- hyperion2010 6y agoBuried in the wiki page for YBCO is a note that REBCO is a synonym of sorts. The superconducting tapes that are discussed in the talk thus would seem to be YBCO.
- Robotbeat 6y agoYes. Re stands for "rare earth," and yttrium is probably the most common one used for ReBCO, but lanthanum is also used.
- dbetteridge 6y agohttps://nationalmaglab.org/magnet-development/magnet-science-technology/publications-mst/highlights-mst/high-temperature-superconducting-rebco-tapes https://nationalmaglab.org/magnet-development/magnet-science... Looks like they 'only' need to be at 4.2Kelvin as well to operate, which is a definite improvement
- MertsA 6y agoThey don't need to be that cold to start superconducting, 4.2K is just the temperature you could expect with liquid helium cooling. It would actually be superconducting with liquid nitrogen but the reason why you would still want to go colder is because superconductors have a maximum magnetic flux that they can sustain while still being superconducting. The current travelling through a superconductor itself also contributes to the magnetic flux so even though it's superconducting there's still a limit as to how much current you can pass through a conductor and how high of a magnetic field you can create. This limit is dependent on temperature though, so you definitely want to use liquid helium so you can create a much stronger magnetic field.
- Robotbeat 6y agoRight. To expand: Maybe someday we can use liquid hydrogen or nitrogen (or even water, depending on progress with hydride superconductors) for these reactors, but a big reason they’re able to make this more compact reactor work is the much higher critical currents/fields that these high temperature superconductors can handle when cooled far below their critical temperature. See: https://fs.magnet.fsu.edu/~lee/plot/plot.htm https://fs.magnet.fsu.edu/~lee/plot/plot.htm
- joeraut 6y agoThe hero we don't deserve.