Article is 50% angry filler that says nothing. The actual content is that (as already reported) Leigh leaked the encryption password for the interacted files

Article is 50% angry filler that says nothing. The actual content is that (as already reported) Leigh leaked the encryption password for the interacted files before Assange leaked unredacted files Assange gave the unredacted files to Leigh instead of giving a redacted copy, despite Assange's scrupulous redaction efforts in the files he originally published Assange (partially) reuses passwords across his wikileaks files(!) and even across passwords he gives to others(!!!) (Leigh) Guardian made a dubious claim that the password had somehow "expired" like an OTP challenge-response code No one from the Guardian isn't on trial for it's part in the allege crime of leaking secrets, showing this is purely a political persecution