4 ms·
[2]: No zero lost or gained. [3]: Err: 100m² are enough get the 100M concentration on the square millimetre, right? A perfect lens of that surface would only n
by loup-vaillant 16y ago
[2]: No zero lost or gained.
[3]: Err: 100m² are enough get the 100M concentration on the square millimetre, right? A perfect lens of that surface would only need to be about 11 meters in diameter. Error on your part, or did I miss something?
- jws 16y ago[3] I got a couple extra zeros in there and calculated for a square millimeter instead of my hypothetical round 1mm fiber. 10m or so should do it.