4 ms·
I put the blame squarely on the consumer. It's partly the reason why these screens rarely hit above 400nits of brightness. Market forces simply don't drive manu
by tedk-42 6y ago
I put the blame squarely on the consumer. It's partly the reason why these screens rarely hit above 400nits of brightness. Market forces simply don't drive manufacturers to make 16GB the base because consumers continue to settle for the 8GB models available.
For general browsing, light workloads and watching videos, it's enough for most people.
- jbarberu 6y agoI do programming and gaming on 8GB and don't see that becoming a problem anytime soon. While there are workflows and software requiring a lot of resources (my work PC has 64GB and frequently uses more than half of that), most "common" uses do not.
- driverdan 6y ago> It's partly the reason why these screens rarely hit above 400nits of brightness Can you give a use case for brighter displays? I usually keep my Macbooks at 3-5 bars of brightness. The only time I turn them up higher than half is when I'm in direct sunlight.