4 ms·
You have to adjust this for people who read the comments but haven't clicked the link :P
by smichel17 6y ago
You have to adjust this for people who read the comments but haven't clicked the link :P
- notRobot 6y agoHow so?
- smichel17 6y agoRe-reading your comment, perhaps I misinterpreted it. > So now we know that a #1 post on HN has about ~450 concurrent visitors I thought you were trying to get a measure of traffic to HN. In that case, the number of visitors to the site is only an approximation. But if you were talking about how much traffic HN directs to the #1 post, then the number is exactly correct.
- notRobot 6y ago> But if you were talking about how much traffic HN directs to the #1 post, then the number is exactly correct. Indeed I was :)
- bdcravens 6y agoThey mean visitors to the link