4 ms·
The best failure mode is none of those. Using your example, the best one is the one that finds the closest approximate word that isn't a slur. That would solve
by filoleg 6y ago
The best failure mode is none of those. Using your example, the best one is the one that finds the closest approximate word that isn't a slur.
That would solve both problems at once, because there is a really strong chance that the first closest guess that isn't a slur is the actual correct word that was said there. And in case it picks an incorrect word, it would have picked it either way and it would have been just as wrong.
So if the voice said "Because lucky you, that's why", in case youtube autotranscript thinks it was "fuck" and not "lucky", it would either default to "lucky" (which is good) or another closest non-slur word like "mucky" or "rocky".
And, in my opinion, this is way better than putting [censored] or any other workaround out of those you mentioned, because all of them have zero chance to end up as the correct word (in case the slur was detected incorrectly), while with the approach I described, it is very possible.
- scrollaway 6y agoI feel like we're arguing for the same thing.
- mantap 6y agoI don't think deaf users would agree with you. Because they are going to be trying to understand if they actually said lucky rather than fuck. Better to choose the best match, and fuck the prudes.