Or how about the fact that >” All three Bohras have consented to the entry of final judgments permanently enjoining them from further violations of the charged

Or how about the fact that >” All three Bohras have consented to the entry of final judgments permanently enjoining them from further violations of the charged provisions, and ordering them to pay total disgorgement of $1,428,094, total prejudgment interest of $118,406, and total penalties of $1,106,399.” It isn’t alleged. They pled out. There is a parallel charge against the husband by the US Attorney in the Western District of Washington, and the court can presume innocence there. But I’m not a juror or a judge so I don’t have to make that same assumption.