4 ms·
Well put. I completely agree. One thing I'd like to add though is that choosing to not play this game does not mean there's no path to large impact / success
by mightybyte 6y ago
Well put. I completely agree. One thing I'd like to add though is that choosing to not play this game does not mean there's no path to large impact / success by conventional metrics. I came away from this article with the distinct feeling that it is focused on big corporate jobs. That certainly is where a large segment of workers are at, but it's not the only place you can be. In particular, I think that in the early stage startup world you don't get a lot of what the article is talking about. In early stage startups decisions made by rank-and-file employees can have very tangible and significant impact on the time scale of weeks to months, not quarters to years like this article seems focused on. Does this early stage startup world have its own set of issues? Of course. But there do exist good opportunities where culture is healthy and good work gets rewarded.
I really like this article's take on this general notion. http://www.samkyle.com/work-for-yourself/ http://www.samkyle.com/work-for-yourself/
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- alexryan 6y agoI'd really like to believe this. Thus far, I've seen the same kind of ruthless self-interest in startups as well. If you know of anywhere this is NOT the case, please share as I would love to work in an environment of people with good character who are genuinely seeking to do good. This is more important to me than money.
- qznc 6y agoIs it really? In the startup world you don't "switch projects" every 18 months. Instead you pivot to a different business plan or start a new company. Grow headcount faster than baseline applies as well.
- mightybyte 6y ago@alexryan's dead sibling comment... I actually work at one of those companies. At the moment we're not hiring, although we may be in the future.