4 ms·
"No individual or group has nothing close to full control of it." Wrong. Full control has been the case for a long time - at least 100 years, possibly thousan
by feralimal 6y ago
"No individual or group has nothing close to full control of it."
Wrong. Full control has been the case for a long time - at least 100 years, possibly thousands. History is so badly mangled however, we cannot read it, but this is evidenced everywhere... I now think that 1984 was actually more fact that fiction.
Worse, our education is such that we are also trained not to observe it. We don't know anything. Really. Say, h2o - water. Find an example of someone adding these 2 gases to create water. You will see pops! and water condensation on bottles - but that is from the air itself. They cannot create water from those 2 gases!
We are on a slave planet, where nothing is as it seems, where we are mostly not even aware that this is the case.
If your experience and understanding of reality is overturned in the coming months or years, bear this in mind. Try not to jump to conclusions, or to lunge out at the first person you feel is to blame for your situation (police, parents, teachers, etc) - these people are as unwitting as everyone else - they believed the stories and disbelieved their own experience.
- gverrilla 6y agowhat group or individual has full control over appearance?
- feralimal 6y agoI'm so downvoted here it takes ages for me to reply. Frankly - I have ideas, but I don't know. You should do your own research and see what you find. In fact, I would suggest that everyone does their own research to confirm or deny what they are presented as truth. As techies here, we should be good at debugging the world right? All the best.
- gverrilla 6y agoThe thing is you are mistaken and you have 0 proof to what you say. It sounds like conspiracy theories, and nothing else.
- feralimal 6y agoI would say I am my own authority on what I accept. However, your authority is the government, consensus opinion, journals, HN - not yourself. If something is not proven to me, I'm not going to pretend it has been. For most, authority is from outside. 'My teachers/lecturers/TV/parents/etc say this, they wouldn't lie, would they?' Its not malicious, but the lies are propagated. The reason is that no one - NO ONE - is doing their own research to verify anything, lies and confusion are spread. So, I would say you have 0 proof to believe what you believe. If you try to prove what you believe in to yourself, you will find that you cannot satisfactorily do so. So why believe it? I'm just not believing things that I have no evidence for. And once you remove the un-evidenced crap, a different picture emerges. But you are easy to use the term 'conspiracy theory' to avoid to have to engage with what I raise. Seriously - take my challenge - try to create water out of the 2 gases. Or to separate them from water. You won't be able to do it. Which shows you how little you know.
- gverrilla 6y agoWe know very little, yes. And sciences fail to admit this often. We are very confused, too. But it seems your just settling for alternative false stories. Did you study enough chemistry to say something like that? Doesn't seem so. It seems you are just watching some youtube video that defies traditional authority with some new bullshit. You said some group has full control of social appearance (for 100years at least), and when I ask for more info you just deviate. On the other hand, I'm sure your intentions are the best and I think you are and should keep being free to think however you like. The great challenge is: what it achieves?