3 ms·
Given the margins it might be that the only reason they're cheaper is they any discount from selling it under a store brand isn't reversed by having to pay prof
by neltnerb 6y ago
Given the margins it might be that the only reason they're cheaper is they any discount from selling it under a store brand isn't reversed by having to pay profits to a pointless middleman.
I don't see a problem with them selling their own banded stuff, or even if it's cheaper, in most senses.
I do see a big problem with using what most people consider to be an open market that you can get anything on (even whole computers!) and specifically using that power to inhibit competition by having different advertising policies. It's not like those products were pulling an epic and refusing to give Amazon a cut of the sale, or doing something illegal -- just being banned from visibility is ridiculous abuse of monopoly power.
- triceratops 6y agoI always thought store brands are cheaper because they don't need any marketing spending like the name brands have to keep doing.
- neltnerb 6y agoEvery little bit helps... these margins are tiny.