2 ms·
That's why I gave an example of translation. There are new sequences as well as words but the original owner still own the copyright based on the observed meani
by searchableguy 6y ago
That's why I gave an example of translation. There are new sequences as well as words but the original owner still own the copyright based on the observed meaning or similarities. If you try searching some of the outputs from gpt, you will come across original source in many cases which are slightly or moderately different.
- natch 6y agoThis is an area open to interpretation but I wouldn’t go so far as to say someone who used a phrase before owns the copyright to a new work that happens to contain that phrase. But yes they certainly own the copyright to their original entire work in its original form. If you’re talking about excerpts longer than a phrase it does become more murky for sure.