> Batteries are only the most of expensive of many candidates for energy storage. Maybe. But nuclear does not require batteries. > But, as was demonstrated in

> Batteries are only the most of expensive of many candidates for energy storage. Maybe. But nuclear does not require batteries. > But, as was demonstrated in Australia, adequate. I do don’t have the numbers from Australia at hand. Do you? Is it really cheaper than nuclear, or they heavily overpaid for them, or Telsa sold it with large discount?