4 ms·
To be fair, that could have been deliberate. When you've got an unhinged dude screaming about how you're oppressing him by blocking his videos, the last thing y
by duskwuff 6y ago
To be fair, that could have been deliberate. When you've got an unhinged dude screaming about how you're oppressing him by blocking his videos, the last thing you want to do is prove him right by blocking his videos.
- uniqueid 6y agoThat's a possibility. I can imagine a scenario where the issue bubbled up the chain a couple levels, with the junior employees not touching anything in the meantime, so as to avoid making things worse. Another possibility is that the employee the system tasked with my report wasn't familiar with the CEO's name yet, and so couldn't follow the gist of the video. It's less likely, but the thought amuses me. I still lean towards it being run-of-the-mill bureaucratic dysfunction. That's partly because it seems in-line with their spotty moderation, and partly, to be honest, because I'm just biased against Youtube.