Fathers would certainly not be pissed off. They'd get to work on being a father. > Forcing someone to stop working would likely piss a lot of people off Which

Fathers would certainly not be pissed off. They'd get to work on being a father. > Forcing someone to stop working would likely piss a lot of people off Which people? Most humans are going to be parents some day, and even those that aren't can see that living in a world where every child has same opportunity in terms of having both parents with them for the first few days, weeks, or months of their lives is a net positive for society. Which father doesn't want time off to be with their children if it doesn't otherwise impact them negatively (ie. they were taken of by their fellow man)? > and would generally hurt the companies these fathers work for. I don't believe that to be true. A company is a group of humans. Giving those humans time off to parent makes healthier, happy humans and a healthier and more effective workforce.