2 ms·
>I don't think we disagree about the $99 upfront -- my interpretation of it is just that Apple has chosen to be a bit less aggressive than would be competitivel
by mcantelon 16y ago
>I don't think we disagree about the $99 upfront -- my interpretation of it is just that Apple has chosen to be a bit less aggressive than would be competitively optimal.
Well, looking at the graph featured in the article I'd say it's high time they get optimal. ;)
- grandalf 16y agoI think it's a case of not wanting to risk messing with such a cash cow (it is resulting in strong profitability). I admit it is very perplexing... both why Apple hasn't responded with a $0 (with contract) iPhone, and why Google has allowed the Android experience to be so mediocre.