4 ms·
* 1 point by somerandomboi 0 minutes ago | edit | delete [–] This appears to be quite a subjective claim, people comprehend/retain information extremely diffe
by somerandomboi 6y ago
*
1 point by somerandomboi 0 minutes ago | edit | delete [–]
This appears to be quite a subjective claim, people comprehend/retain information extremely differently. The ls command applied as an example to the argument undermines its credibility, as virtually every Unix user is aware of its importance. ls remains arguably the most Unix filesystem command, why would it be difficult for users to understand its relevancy?
- inopinatus 6y agoThe author isn’t talking about teaching ls, but about using it to teach fundamental principles of Unix, in particular “do one thing well” in the context of piped standardised regular line-oriented text formats. So ls is chosen because it is supposed to be the universally familiar archetype, but author is noting that corruption of the underlying principle in the default configuration of some variants & distributions has extended to something as basic as this.
- saagarjha 6y agoHey, it looks like you've copied more of your comment than you intended to ;)