Physics isn't ontology. You perceive a phenomenon, pick quantifiable observables, take measurements of them using units which are nothing more than reference me

Physics isn't ontology. You perceive a phenomenon, pick quantifiable observables, take measurements of them using units which are nothing more than reference measurements, come up with a mathematical model for those observables and test its predictions. That happens to be the best you can do with inductive reasoning. Believe it or not we don't establish reality, we just live in it. This is only a general comment because I don't understand anything you've written so I can't address your points, which undoubtedly must exist.