> The burden of proof runs the other way. It’s mundane and uncontroversial to state that open plan offices fail to save money. What? That seems to be the oppos

> The burden of proof runs the other way. It’s mundane and uncontroversial to state that open plan offices fail to save money. What? That seems to be the opposite of what most folks would reasonably intuit. More space per worker means more offices means higher cost. I'm surprised to see someone suggest they somehow you could use twice as much space for the same cost.