2 ms·
> A possible product that I think is likely to play out this way is water desalination. Desalinated water is very expensive because of the embedded energy cost:
by aazaa 6y ago
> A possible product that I think is likely to play out this way is water desalination. Desalinated water is very expensive because of the embedded energy cost: it's often described as "bottled electricity". Currently we tend to use reverse osmosis because it's more energy efficient; but if you don't have to worry about energy costs, you might choose instead to boil water and distil it: since the capital costs are cheaper.
Here's another possibility: Bitcoin mining.
It's been discussed a lot - mostly hypothetically, but has a fraction of the distribution cost. There is a non-negligible capital cost that will turn over periodically. But there's nothing to ship at the end of it all. And if you're getting paid to use power, then it might be possible to come out ahead.
And then there's the non-negligible cost of locating a desalination plant next to the ocean, where the effluent pollutes the environment.
- heartbeats 6y agoBitcoin mining is dominated by capex, not opex. It makes much more sense to buy your rigs and pay whatever you have to pay to keep them on 24/7.
- samatman 6y agoPerhaps some limited utility for remote locations where methane is being flared off, because both capturing the methane and transmitting electrical power are too expensive. Putting a generator in place to convert the methane to electricity, then crunching the value into bits on-site, might add up. I agree that it isn't going to be useful for periodic cheap energy, however; there's no scenario where intermittently running your ASICs is going to add up.