4 ms·
Yep we have done this even before lockdowns. If even just one person is remote, we ask everyone to call in rather than going to a meeting room, to force the mee
by throwawaysea 6y ago
Yep we have done this even before lockdowns. If even just one person is remote, we ask everyone to call in rather than going to a meeting room, to force the meeting to be run in an accommodative manner. You need these practices if you collaborate with teams in different offices anyways.
- jovdg 6y agoSounds like a terrible thing.
- dredmorbius 6y agoIf it's a terrible thing for all, why is it not a terrible thing for the minority? The field is levelled.
- uxp100 6y agoIs that good? Doesn’t that breed resentment? “Oh, since there is a remote person in the meeting we all have to deal with poor audio, lag, and no eye-contact?” I should say I was remote for 5 years and the meetings where everyone was remote were much longer, extra overhead, slower responses, and less engagement. They were bad. I’d rather be not an equal participant in a good meeting than fully equal in a bad meeting.
- dredmorbius 6y agoFair enough. Though to be clear, the question is whether the benefits of treating the entire team uniformly outweigh the disadvantages of imposing telecoms frictions on all members, rather than just a portion.
- sidibe 6y agoOn the other hand this is rough on the people who aren't in the meeting who now have neighbors talking at their desks instead of in meeting rooms