Misleading title. It gives the impression that Google tried WFH, found it to be inadequate, and took a U-turn, saying 'on-site work' is the future (as well as t

Misleading title. It gives the impression that Google tried WFH, found it to be inadequate, and took a U-turn, saying 'on-site work' is the future (as well as the past, and WFH was a failed experiment). But in the body of the article, the CEO is advocating a hybrid model, with increased flexibility for WFH, so much so that working from office are being declared special days (meetings), labelled 'on-site days' ('on-site meetings').