3 ms·
That's standard legalese since they don't have any context to identify who "I" is. And the real identity of many people involved with WikiLeaks seems to be unk
by curryst 6y ago
That's standard legalese since they don't have any context to identify who "I" is. And the real identity of many people involved with WikiLeaks seems to be unknown, so it isn't impossible that it was someone else. It makes it the weakest evidence that NF is Assange, but it has some circumstantial value.
- pera 6y ago> the real identity of many people involved with WikiLeaks seems to be unknown It seems I wasn't clear before but this is exactly what I intended to imply: If they cannot attest that JA was the only member present at that conference then that line of argument is insufficient to make the claim they are making.